ON THE POSSIBILITY OF USING ADDITIVE TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OF CRANKSHAFTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32339/0135-5910-2025-11-34-42Keywords:
3D printing, WAAM technology, microstructure, macrostructure, nonmetallic inclusions, physical and mechanical propertiesAbstract
This study demonstrated the fundamental feasibility of producing a crankshaft using electric-arc wire 3D growth of metal parts on the WI 1500 process system. Specifically, the feasibility of manufacturing a crankshaft using Sv-08KhN2GMTA wire, which complies with GOST 2246–70, was investigated. Testing determined the chemical composition, mechanical properties, hardness, non-metallic inclusion content, grain size, micro- and macrostructure, and microhardness of the test sample. The results showed significantly higher relative elongation, relative contraction, and impact toughness compared to a hot-rolled blank, demonstrating the high strength and ductility of the material. The sample's microstructure is represented by bainite with clearly defined layers, ensuring excellent mechanical properties. The sample's macrostructure is free of defects such as porosity, pinholes, and cracks, and has a dense, uniform structure with typical characteristics of 3D printing. The sample is characterized by a high purity level of non-metallic inclusions, which also positively impacts its mechanical properties. The hardness of the samples produced by the weld deposition method exceeds that of hot-rolled blanks, making them promising for use under high loads and wear. Analysis of the obtained results convincingly demonstrates that additive manufacturing using the fused adhesion method (WAAM) ensures isotropic physical and mechanical properties. Moreover, this sample production method ensures the required quality of macro- and microstructural parameters, which is critical for ensuring the performance characteristics of the final product.
References
ГОСТ Р 57558–2025 (ИСО/АСТМ 52900:2021). Аддитивные технологии. Базовые принципы. Термины и определения. — М.: Российский институт стандартизации. — 31 c.
Majid S. N. A., Alkahari M. R., Ramli F. R. etc. Influence of integrated pressing during fused filament fabrication on tensile strength and porosity // Journal of Mechanical Engineering. 2017. V. SI 3, Iss. 2. P. 185–195.
Zhou J. G., He Z. Y. A new rapid tooling technique and its special binder study // Rapid Prototyping Journal. 1999. V. 5. №. 2. P. 82–88. DOI: 10.1108/13552549910267461.
Ding D. H., Pan Z. X., Cuiuri D. etc. Adaptive path planning for wire-feed additive manufacturing using medialax-is transformation // Journal of Cleaner Production. 2016. V. 133. P. 942–952. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.036.
Sharma V., Singh S. Rapid prototyping: process advantage, comparison and application // International Journal of Computational Intelligence Research. 2016. V. 12, № 1. P. 55–61.
Nimawat D., Meghvanshi M. Using rapid prototyping technology in mechanical scale models // International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications. 2012. V. 2, Iss. 2. P. 215–219.
Nazan M. A., Ramli F. R., Alkahari M. R., Abdullah M. A. Optimization of warping deformation in open source 3D printer using response surface method // Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering Research Day. 2016. P. 71, 72.
Abe T., Sasahara H. Dissimilar metal deposition with a stainless steel and nickel-based alloy using wire and arc-based additive manufacturing // Precision Engineering. 2016. V. 45. P. 387–395. DOI: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2016.03.016.
Nilsiam Y., Sanders P. G., Pearce J. M. Applications of open source GMAW-based metal 3-D printing // Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing. 2018. V. 2, Iss. 1. 18. DOI: 10.3390/jmmp2010018.
Yilmaz O., Ugla A. A. Shaped metal deposition technique in additive manufacturing technology: A review // Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture. 2016. V. 230, Iss. 10. P. 1781–1798. DOI: 10.1177/0954405416640181.
Chen W., Yang T., Yang R. 3D model of filler melting with micro-beam plasma arc based on additive manufac-turing technology // International Journal of Modern Physics B. 2017. V. 31. № 16–19. 17440167. DOI: 10.1142/S0217979217440167.
Tabernero I., Paskual A., Alvarez P., Suarez A. Study on arc welding processes for high deposition rate additive manufacturing // Procedia CIRP. 2018. V. 68. P. 358–362. DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2017.12.095.
Szost B. A., Terzi S., Martina F. etc. A comparative study of additive manufacturing techniques: residual stress and microstructure analysis of CLAD and WAAM printed Ti–6Al–4V components // Materials & Design. 2016. V. 89. P. 559–567. DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.09.115.
Karanukaran K. P., Suryakumar S., Pushpa V., Akula S. Low cost integration of additive and subtractive pro-cesses for hybrid layered manufacturing // Robotic and Computer Integrated Manufacturing. 2010. V. 26. № 5. P. 490–499. DOI: 10.1016/i.rcim.2010.03.008.
Radaj D. Heat effects of welding: temperature field, residual stress and distortion. — Springer Berlin, Heidelberg. P. 130–133. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-48640-1.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ЧЕРНАЯ МЕТАЛЛУРГИЯ. Бюллетень научно-технической и экономической информации

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.