ASSESSMENT OF THE SHEET STEEL SURFACE ROUGHNESS TO JUSTIFY THE TARGET VALUES OF ITS PARAMETERS

Authors

  • M. I. RUMYANTSEV Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Russia, Magnitogorsk Author
  • A. N. ZAVALISHCHIN Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Russia, Magnitogorsk Author
  • V. L. KORNILOV Corporate Training Center “Personnel”, Russia, Magnitogorsk Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32339/0135-5910-2024-8-45-53

Keywords:

cold-rolled flat products, surface roughness, surface roughness assessment, rolled flat products surface roughness rationing, black plate, electrolytic tinplate, tin coating mass, corrosion resistance, consistently quantity of the highest grade products

Abstract

Sheet steel roughness estimation is considered as determination of influence of surface roughness on quality characteristics and production process efficiency. A comprehensive quantitative assessment of the impact of the steel base surface roughness on the quality and quantity of the highest grade of Electrolytic Tinplate was performed. An increase in the Arithmetical mean deviation of the assessed profile (Ra), oriented perpendicular to the rolling direction, increases the tin consumption, worsens the corrosion resistance and stampability of the Electrolytic Tinplate. However, at the same timethe quantity of the highest grade products is increases. Quantitative assessment of the combined effect of the steel base surface roughness, the velocity of strip and the tinning current indicates that the effect of the roughnessis more significant for the stampability and corrosion resistance of the Electrolytic Tinplate. The mass of the coating is been defined largely bythe tinning current strength. The minimum deviation the actual mass of the coating from the nominal, satisfactory corrosion resistance of the Electrolytic Tinplate and a consistently quantity of the highest grade products are observed if the steel base surface roughness issatisfies the restrictions: 0.35 ≤ Ra ≤ 0.63 μm for a class III coating and 0.35 ≤ Ra ≤ 0.55 μm for a class II coatingper GOST 13345–85, nominal mass of which is corresponds to E8,4 and E5,6 coatings per GOST R 52204–2004.

Author Biographies

  • M. I. RUMYANTSEV, Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Russia, Magnitogorsk

    HD (Tech.), Professor of the Department of Material Processing

  • A. N. ZAVALISHCHIN , Nosov Magnitogorsk State Technical University, Russia, Magnitogorsk

    HD (Tech.), Professor of the Department of Foundry Processes and Materials Science

  • V. L. KORNILOV, Corporate Training Center “Personnel”, Russia, Magnitogorsk

    PhD (Tech.), Honored Metallurgist of the Russian Federation, Laureate of the Government of the Russian Federation in the Field of Science and Technology, Head of the Department of Metallurgical Production Technology

References

Belov V. K., D'yakova M. V., Las'kov S. A. etc. 3D surface microtopography of cold-rolled and galvanized strip // Steel in Translation. 2013. V. 43. № 11. P. 750–755. DOI: 10.3103/S0967091213110028. EDN: SLNKYX.

Bozhkov A. I., Kovalev D. A., Orekhov M. E. etс. Controlling the surface roughness of cold-rolled strip. Part 1 // Steel in Translation. 2017. V. 47. P. 691–694. DOI: 10.3103/S0967091217100023.

Трайно А. И., Пименов А. Ф., Заверюха В. Н. и др. Методы определения шероховатости холодноката-ных листов // Известия вузов. Черная металлургия. 1981. № 9. С. 76–81.

Румянцев М. И. Улучшение качества черной жести регулированием ее микрогеометрии при дрессиров-ке: дис. … канд. техн. наук. — Магнитогорск, 1989. — 202 с.

Новак Л. Ш., Румянцев М. И., Пантелеева О. И. и др. Методика контроля шероховатости поверхности черной жести // Черная металлургия. Бюллетень научно-технической и экономической информации. 1990. № 9. С. 55, 56.

Лайнер В. И., Кудрявцев Н. Т. Основы гальваностегии. — М.: Металлургиздат, 1953. — 587с.

Каданер Л. И. Влияние макрорельефа на распределение тока на электродах // Журнал прикладной хи-мии. 1953. Т. 30. № 1. С. 72–80.

Гнусин И. П., Коварений Н. Я. Шероховатость электроосажденных поверхностей. — Новосибирск: Наука. 1970. — 325 с.

Salm D., Towers A., Kaan D. The development of a lowtin coating mass tinplate // LTS. Proceedings of 2nd In-ternational Tinplate Conference. London. 1980. P. 112–123.

Wu F., Liu X., Xiao X. Surface characterisation of electroplated tinplate with different coating mass // Surface Engineering. 2017. V. 34. P. 1–6. DOI: 10.1080/02670844.2017.1288343.

Wu F., Liu X., Xiao X. Influence of Current Density on Coating Mass Distribution and Surface Coverage during Electrodeposition of Tin on Carbon Steel // International Journal of Electrochemical Science. 2020. V. 15. P. 8119–8128. DOI: 10.20964/2020.08.64.

Rumyantsev М. I., Tulupov О. N. Further developments in simulation of metal forming processes // CIS Iron and Steel Review. 2018. V. 16. P. 21–24.

Кацер И. М., Кормаз В. В., Виноградов В. П. Обеспечение требуемой шероховатости стальной основы для белой жести // Черная металлургия. Бюллетень научно-технической и экономической информации. 1986. № 1. С. 50, 51.

Shatalov R. L., Kulikov M. A. Influence of Outer Parts of a Strip on the Deformation and Force Parameters of Thin-Sheet Rolling // Metallurgist. 2020. V. 64. № 7–8. P. 687–698. DOI: 10.1007/s11015-020-01045-1.

Published

2026-06-15

Issue

Section

Прокатное производство

How to Cite

ASSESSMENT OF THE SHEET STEEL SURFACE ROUGHNESS TO JUSTIFY THE TARGET VALUES OF ITS PARAMETERS. (2026). Ferrous Metallurgy. Bulletin of Scientific , Technical and Economic Information, 80(8), 45-53. https://doi.org/10.32339/0135-5910-2024-8-45-53